DISINFO: Britain seeks another anti-Russian provocation

DISINFORMATION CASE DETAILS

AI translations:

DISINFO: Britain seeks another anti-Russian provocation

SUMMARY

The Douma attack and the poisoning of former spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter in Salisbury are parts of the same plot. Evidence is destroyed. OPCW mission was manipulated by the British. And now US BZ nerve agent’s discovery in the Skripal samples.. Who is to say that nothing else was injected – like the agent used to allegedly poison the Skripals? As evidence is destroyed and the Skripals are “abducted”, Britain seeks another anti-Russian provocation – with warnings of a Russian cyber-attack.

RESPONSE

No evidence given. Many competing and contradictory stories promulgated by Russian state-controlled media on the Skripal poisoning and Douma chemical attack https://euvsdisinfo.eu/disinformation-cases/?text=sergei+skripal&disinfo_issue=&date=, euvsdisinfo.eu/disinformation-cases/?text=douma&disinfo_issue=&date=,

On Sunday 4 March Sergei and Yulia Skripal were poisoned in Salisbury with a military-grade nerve agent of a type developed by Russia.

For the UK response see: www.gov.uk/government/news/novichok-nerve-agent-use-in-salisbury-uk-government-response,

The laboratory has answered to Russian claims about BZ https://twitter.com/SpiezLab/status/985243574123057152

The OPCW have confirmed the UK findings in the case. "The results of the analysis by the OPCW designated laboratories of environmental and biomedical samples collected by the OPCW team confirm the findings of the United Kingdom relating to the identity of the toxic chemical that was used in Salisbury and severely injured three people." https://www.opcw.org/news/article/opcw-issues-report-on-technical-assistance-requested-by-the-united-kingdom/

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    %s

      Your opinion matters!

      Data Protection Information *

        Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

        Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

        Data Protection Information *

        The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.

        🎵 Playlist