DISINFO: Georges Soros controls the ECHR through its judges and other global governance bodies

DISINFORMATION CASE DETAILS

DISINFO: Georges Soros controls the ECHR through its judges and other global governance bodies

SUMMARY

How to explain that 22/100 judges of the ECHR during the last ten years have relations and links with the Open Society Foundation?

Because there has been a whole policy since the 2000s of strengthening the power of NGOs with this type of body of global governance and therefore private organisations have more and more influence while at the same time States see their influence decrease, their budgets decline in favour of successive economic crises since the beginning of the 21st century. This is in line with Soros' ideology of an open society, which is precisely to bypass states. The sovereign prerogatives of states and government authorities recognised by the populations exert an indirect influence through bodies of which the people know little.

RESPONSE

Recurring pro-Kremlin conspiracy about George Soros and the work done by the Open Society Foundation to support independent groups working for justice, democratic governance, and human rights worldwide. Out of 12,000 cases in our database, more than 200 target George Soros. See our article covering some of the disinformation narratives attacking him.

The fact that some lawyers worked at some point in their career for an NGO that received funds from the Open Society Foundation before becoming a judge for the ECHR is not sufficient to declare a potential conflict of interest.

The recruitment process for judges to the ECHR is as follows: each member state of the Council of Europe proposes three candidates, from whom one is elected for a 9 years non-renewable mandate. This ensures the diversity of the court.

Read also related stories: The judges of the ECHR are affiliated with Soros, George Soros forces EU civil servants to implement his policies.

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    %s

      Your opinion matters!

      Data Protection Information *

        Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

        Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

        Data Protection Information *

        The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.

        🎵 Playlist