DISINFO: Kursk incursion wasted 7.8 billion dollars of Western taxpayers money

DISINFORMATION CASE DETAILS

  • Outlet: sputnikglobe.com ( archive, original )
  • Date of publication: April 14, 2025
  • Article language(s): English
  • Countries / regions discussed: Ukraine, US, EU, UK

AI translations:

DISINFO: Kursk incursion wasted 7.8 billion dollars of Western taxpayers money

SUMMARY

Kyiv lost 5,500 units of military equipment supplied by the West in the Kursk Region. This incursion robbed Western taxpayers of 7.8 billion dollars.

RESPONSE

The figures provided in this disinformation story are made up, aiming to undermine international support for Ukraine by portraying it as a waste of taxpayers’ money.

According to accounts by independent observers at Oryx OSINT project, which tracks Ukrainian and Russian losses through open-source data, by the time this disinformation story appeared Ukraine had lost around 870 pieces of equipment during the battle for Kursk Oblast, mostly armoured fighting vehicles, infantry mobility vehicles, self-propelled artillery, and tanks.

Not only is this a much lower number than the 5,500 pieces claimed in this disinformation story, but these losses also included equipment from the Soviet-era arsenals, not merely weaponry supplied by Western countries after the start of the Russian invasion. As a result, the economic calculation featured in this disinformation story is necessarily wrong and greatly exaggerated.

See other examples of similar disinformation narratives, such as claims that Western weapons supplies to Ukraine are exacerbating the conflict, that EU leaders gave Ukrainian Nazis money to buy weapons, that US aid to Ukraine will only prolong the agony of Zelenskyy's regime, or that Western weapons are of no help to Ukraine's failing counter-offensive.

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    %s

      Your opinion matters!

      Data Protection Information *

        Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

        Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

        Data Protection Information *

        The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.

        🎵 Playlist