DISINFO: Political developments in post-Soviet states are foreign plots against Russia
SUMMARY
Opposition protests in Serbia, unconstitutional actions by Moldovan authorities against the Governor of Gagauzia, efforts by the Georgian opposition to unseat the ruling Georgian Dream party, Armenian Prime Minister Pashinyan’s attacks on the Apostolic Church, and the anti-Russian campaign in Azerbaijan all have domestic roots in corruption and power struggles — yet they also demonstrate foreign influence aimed at undermining Russia.
There are attempts to create new hotspots of tension and open new fronts against Russia. These efforts currently come primarily from the UK and its junior partner Türkiye, as well as from France and the EU leadership. The West now sees the Ukrainian front as losing importance, and analysts suggest that the United States is distancing itself from the conflict. This is how the Pentagon’s decision to partially suspend arms deliveries to Kyiv in the coming months is explained.
Foreign strategists, disappointed in Ukraine, have begun betting on destabilising other regions and countries neighbouring or allied with Russia. They have found points of convergence between their interests and the forces currently implementing their agenda.
RESPONSE
This is a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative portraying political developments in neighbouring countries as instigated from abroad, often by the US and the West. The disinformation narrative has been applied, among others, to reports about protests in Georgia, Armenia, Ukraine, the Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Belarus, Venezuela, Slovakia, Hong Kong, to portray protest movements as aggressive actors who constantly prepare new coups.
The article provides no evidence to support the claim that any of the numerous and disparate events mentioned have the ultimate goal of targeting Russia.
These events indeed stem from internal political, social, or economic challenges unique to each country. Claiming that they are coordinated as part of a singular anti-Russian operation reveals a worldview rooted in extreme self-centrism. According to this narrative, no political activity in Russia’s neighbourhood can be organic or legitimate unless it aligns with the Kremlin interests.
Moreover, this narrative erases the agency of millions of people in these countries who are engaging in democratic protests, institutional reform, or national debate. It infantilizes entire societies by suggesting they are incapable of independent action and must therefore be puppets of hostile Western forces.
See similar cases that the US and EU coordinate colour revolutions to destabilise Russia, that Brussels is preparing colour revolutions in Serbia, Hungary and Bosnia and Herzegovina, that protests in Georgia are foreign-supported to generate anti-Russian sentiments, that the West is planning revolutions in the former Soviet Republics, that the West instigates colour revolutions in Central Asian countries, and that the West want to start a colour revolution in Georgia and use it against Russia.