DISINFO: Return of Crimean artefacts from the Netherlands to Ukraine is legitimised robbery

DISINFORMATION CASE DETAILS

  • Outlet: RIA ( archive #1, archive #2, original )
  • Date of publication: October 26, 2021
  • Article language(s): Russian
  • Countries / regions discussed: Ukraine, Russia, The Netherlands, EU

DISINFO: Return of Crimean artefacts from the Netherlands to Ukraine is legitimised robbery

SUMMARY

A Dutch appeals court’s ruling about the return of Crimean gold artefacts from the Netherlands to Ukraine is a politicised decision and can be regarded as a legitimised robbery of cultural values.

RESPONSE

Disinformation claim that appeared in the context of illegal annexation of Crimea.

A Dutch museum borrowed a trove of ancient Scythian treasures in February 2014 from four museums in Crimea and one museum from Kyiv for an exhibition named "Crimea - Gold and secrets of the Black Sea". It was shortly before the illegal annexation of the peninsula by Russia. The legal action began in 2014 when the Crimean museums tried to have the gold collection back to the occupied peninsula. A Dutch court ruled on 14 December 2016 in favour of Ukraine. An appeals court backed the previous ruling on 26 October 2021.

This ruling is not a robbery, it is a rightful decision to return the gold treasures to the country where they belong. The European Union does not recognise Russia’s claim for sovereignty over Crimea. It means that the artefacts must return to their country of origin, that is Ukraine. Ukrainian Justice Minister Denys Malyuska said that the Crimean museums may file a complaint against the court's ruling, but their chances of success are very small.

The Scythians were a group of ancient nomadic warrior tribes known from the 9th century BC to the 2nd century BC. Part of them lived on the territory of contemporary Southern Ukraine, particularly Crimea. Although they did not have a system of writing and were illiterate, they were known for their mastery in making exquisite gold jewellery.

Read similar disinformation narratives about the West’s alleged anti-Russian activities.

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    %s

      Your opinion matters!

      Data Protection Information *

        Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

        Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

        Data Protection Information *

        The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.

        🎵 Playlist