DISINFO: The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and the USSR did not contribute to the start of WWII

DISINFORMATION CASE DETAILS

DISINFO: The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and the USSR did not contribute to the start of WWII

SUMMARY

From a historical perspective, attempts to blame Moscow for the outbreak of WWII are pathetic and ridiculous. Firstly, the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was actually the Treaty of Non-Aggression between Germany and the Soviet Union. After Moscow's unsuccessful attempts to reach agreements with Britain and France to oppose Nazi Germany, there was nothing surprising or criminal about the treaty. It was a logical step to delay the war by almost two years. Secondly, Hitler signed similar treaties with many European countries, including the 1933 Pact of Four, the 1934 Pilsudski-Hitler Pact, the 1935 Maritime Agreement with Great Britain, and others.

RESPONSE

The claim advances a recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative distorting the events leading up to the Second World War, in particular denying USSR responsibility for starting WWII after signing the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact in 1939.

The Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact of August 1939 contained a secret supplementary protocol that resulted in a coordinated Nazi-Soviet campaign against Poland and decided the carving up of Eastern Europe between the USSR and the Third Reich.

The secret protocol was revealed after Germany's defeat in 1945, although hints about its provisions had been leaked much earlier.

See here for our debunking of the claim that the Soviet Union was "forced" to conclude an agreement with Hitler. Read more about the Pact here.

See similar disinformation cases on the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact in our database: West rewriting history by claiming USSR colluded with Nazi GermanyPoland re-writes history claiming the USSR attacked it in September 1939the West tries to revise history, questioning the decisions of the Nuremberg trialEurope is to blame for the outbreak of WWII.

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    %s

      Your opinion matters!

      Data Protection Information *

        Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

        Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

        Data Protection Information *

        The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.

        🎵 Playlist