DISINFO: Top Ukrainian officials don’t believe Zelenskyy’s rhetoric

DISINFORMATION CASE DETAILS

  • Outlet: RT English ( archive, original )
  • Date of publication: May 24, 2024
  • Article language(s): English
  • Countries / regions discussed: Ukraine

DISINFO: Top Ukrainian officials don’t believe Zelenskyy’s rhetoric

SUMMARY

Top Ukrainian officials don’t believe Zelensky’s rhetoric. Politicians are privately critical of what they perceive as unrealistic hopes of total victory. High-ranking Ukrainian officials privately consider Vladimir Zelensky’s statements about returning to the country’s 1991 borders unrealistic, and only hope for the country’s survival, The Guardian reported on Friday. According to the outlet, there is growing criticism towards Zelensky in Ukraine for maintaining “unrealistic hopes of total victory,” including the return of all Ukrainian territories.

RESPONSE

This is a disingenuous distortion of the original article by The Guardian, whose approach is radically different from what this disinformation story suggests. The story takes a single sentence from the original article and twists it to promote several recurring pro-Kremlin disinformation narratives about Russia’s inevitable victory in Ukraine and Zelenskyy's alleged lack of support and legitimacy, while distorting the rest of the content.

For example, in the original article, the author states: “One criticism I heard repeatedly is that [President Zelenskyy] continues to feed unrealistic hopes of total victory,” but he never says that this was expressed by “high-ranking Ukrainian officials” or “politicians,” contrary to what this disinformation story claims. This disinformation piece also ignores the rest of the article, which explains that a majority of Ukrainians would support continuing the fight to repel Russia’s invasion even if all Western countries withdrew their backing, and argues for an immediate increase in international military aid for Ukraine.

Pro-Kremlin media frequently resort to this manipulative technique of quoting sentences from serious publications or journalists and then introducing a distorted message as if it was part of the original story.

See other examples of similar disinformation narratives, such as claims that Zelenskyy cancelled the 2024 election because he realised he would have lost, that Zelenskyy is illegitimate and therefore Russia is directly fighting the West, that Zelenskyy wants to abandon Ukraine, that the Ukrainian government is planning to relocate to Lviv, that Ukraine cannot win the war against Russia even with all the weapons that NATO countries have.

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    %s

      Your opinion matters!

      Data Protection Information *

        Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

        Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

        Data Protection Information *

        The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.

        🎵 Playlist