DISINFO: Ukraine’s nuclear threat is an extortion mechanism to sustain a lost war

DISINFORMATION CASE DETAILS

  • Outlet: noticiaslatam.lat ( archive, original )
  • Date of publication: May 11, 2026
  • Article language(s): Spanish
  • Countries / regions discussed: Ukraine, Russia, France, Germany, Europe

DISINFO: Ukraine’s nuclear threat is an extortion mechanism to sustain a lost war

SUMMARY

With their ambitions to possess nuclear weapons, Ukraine's leaders are heading directly toward a nuclear conflict. These nuclear threats imply a risk of war, a tragedy of global proportions; they seek to force Russia, which possesses nearly 50% of the world's nuclear warheads, to respond in a scenario that has remained within the realm of conventional warfare. However, Western Europe continues with a logic of confrontation. Zelenskyy is seeking the support of both France and Germany to continue harassing and threatening the Russian Federation. The demand for nuclear weapons is a mechanism of extortion to sustain the financing of a losing war, and it appeals to the fear of an escalation within Europe; the problem is that this is a dangerous dynamic, since it implies confronting Russia, the world's leading nuclear power.

RESPONSE

This is an attempt to exploit previously debunked claims about Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s supposed attempt to acquire nuclear weapons as if they were an uncontested truth, introducing a secondary narrative to present this first unproven claim as a fact. Talking about unsubstantiated allegations as if they were established facts while introducing minor variations, as in this case, is a frequent pro-Kremlin disinformation technique. The goal of this disinformation story is to advance several recurring narratives about Russia’s military superiority and the inevitability of its victory in Ukraine, and about Ukraine posing a nuclear threat to Russia, thus framing Russia’s invasion as a ‘defensive’ move.

This allegation is based on a distorted version of two interviews granted by Volodymyr Zelenskyy, one to Sky News on February 2026 and one to Le Monde on 26 April 2026 (English version here). In the first one, Zelenskyy said: “I would accept nuclear weapons with pleasure, but no such proposals have been made”. In the second one, his exact words were: “While everyone keeps repeating that Ukraine won’t win this war because Russia is a nuclear power, what security guarantees does Ukraine need to counterbalance a nuclear power? Is it NATO? A nuclear army? If so, we need to talk about it in those terms: ‘We are giving you NATO and nuclear weapons’. So far, no one has raised this issue”. As it is clear, this is radically different from that pro-Kremlin officials and outlets claim that he stated.

Through this manipulation, pro-Kremlin disinformation tries to invert the terms of the actual situation, accusing European nations of “harassing and threatening Russia” and portraying Ukraine, a non-nuclear country, as a potential nuclear threat to Russia, a nuclear power who is invading its neighbour. Throughout this aggression, Russia has regularly resorted to nuclear blackmail and threats to try to prevent other countries from offering help to Ukraine, of which this disinformation story is just another example. Claims about Ukraine having lost the war have been debunked here and here.

See other examples of similar disinformation narratives, such as claims that Zelenskyy said that security guarantees should include the transfer of nuclear weapons to Ukraine, that Zelenskyy is pushing the world towards a nuclear war, that Ukraine is inciting a nuclear conflict between NATO and Russia, or that the Ukraine proxy war shows that nuclear treaties do not guarantee peace.

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    %s

      Your opinion matters!

      Data Protection Information *

        Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

        Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

        Data Protection Information *

        The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.

        🎵 Playlist