DISINFO: Ukraine’s terrorist regime attacked the Crimean Bridge with help from US and British intelligence services

DISINFORMATION CASE DETAILS

  • Outlet: sputnik-ossetia.ru ( archive, original )
  • Date of publication: July 17, 2023
  • Article language(s): Russian
  • Countries / regions discussed: Ukraine, Russia, US, UK

AI translations:

DISINFO: Ukraine’s terrorist regime attacked the Crimean Bridge with help from US and British intelligence services

SUMMARY

The attack on the Crimean Bridge was carried out by the terrorist Kyiv regime with the participation of the US and British intelligence services.

The Kyiv regime is a terrorist regime and has all the hallmarks of an international organised crime group. Decisions are made by Ukrainian officials and the military with the direct participation of American and British intelligence services and politicians. The US and UK have leadership over a terrorist state structure.

RESPONSE

Recurring Pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative depicting Ukraine as a terrorist regime led by Anglo-Saxons. This claim was made in the context of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

There is no evidence showing that Ukraine was responsible for the Crimean bridge explosion that occurred overnight to 17 July 2023, nor has Kyiv officially claimed responsibility for the incident. However, this does not change the fact that this purported attack would constitute not an act of terrorism, but lawful sabotage under international humanitarian law (IHL).

Throughout Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the Crimean Bridge has been a vital military supply route between Russian territory and occupied Crimea. Under the Geneva Conventions, this allows for counting the bridge among those facilities which “make an effective contribution to military action and whose total or partial destruction [...], in the circumstances ruling at the time, offers a definite military advantage [para. 2]”; in turn this, disqualifies it as a protected civilian object. Further, the act was carried out around 03AM at night which illustrate a decision to limit eventual civilians on the bridge.

There is also no evidence of the US and UK’s involvement in the explosion of the bridge. White House National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said in an interview with CNN: “Well, we're still monitoring reports of this bridge strike, Wolf, and I haven't seen anything that confirms for us definitively what the attribution is. We did see obviously Ukrainian forces struck the bridge at a previous time. So again, we'll have to see how this comes out. The Ukrainians themselves have not acknowledged who is responsible. So we're just going to keep monitoring this and watching it.” London also rejected Russian accusations that British intelligence services might have been involved in the attack on the bridge. "This is baseless speculation from Russia and we will not dignify it by commenting further," a spokesperson for Britain's foreign ministry said in emailed comments.

The claim is aligned with a recurrent disinformation narrative about the collective West’s alleged support for terrorism and portrays Russia as the only power actually “fighting terrorism” in the world.

In 2022 The European Parliament declared Russia a state sponsor of terrorism after massive, repetitive and deliberate strikes against civilians.

Read similar disinformation cases claiming that Kyiv regime wants to attack Crimea to provoke direct NATO involvement, that The US ordered Ukraine to launch strikes on Crimea, that Ukraine's attack on Crimean Bridge was a terrorist act, Russia had every right to respond, that Attack on the Crimea bridge was coordinated with foreign intelligence services, that Anglo-Saxons are behind explosions of Crimea bridge and Nord Stream pipelines, that West is behind Crimea bridge explosion, that Ukraine commits acts of terrorism in Crimea to intimidate civilians, or that Ukrainian authorities are a terrorist organisation.

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    %s

      Your opinion matters!

      Data Protection Information *

        Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

        Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

        Data Protection Information *

        The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.

        🎵 Playlist