DISINFO: Under Minsk Agreements Donetsk & Luhansk could return to Ukraine in exchange for refusing to join NATO

DISINFORMATION CASE DETAILS

DISINFO: Under Minsk Agreements Donetsk & Luhansk could return to Ukraine in exchange for refusing to join NATO

SUMMARY

The Minsk agreement was that Russia would return these territories [Luhansk and Donetsk] to Ukraine, and Ukraine would simply not join NATO. That is, these territories, which would be returned to Ukraine, would have the right of veto.

RESPONSE

A pro-Kremlin disinformation narrative about the Minsk agreements. This claim emerged in the context of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

Contrary to the claim, none of the Minsk agreements included a condition of Ukraine's refusal to join NATO, or the granting of veto rights over the country's foreign policy under conditions of increased self-government for the Donetsk and Luhansk regions.

Before the invasion, Russia was a party to the Minsk agreements, and these are the most recent formal documents in which Russia has affirmed Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. Russia has however not delivered on its side of the implementation of the Minsk agreements. The main impediment to a peace settlement in Donbas was, in fact, Russia’s and its proxies’ deliberate unwillingness to implement the Minsk agreements. These documents, signed by representatives of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), Ukraine, Russia and leaders of the illegal separatist entities (DNR and LNR), provide, among other things, for a comprehensive ceasefire and withdrawal of foreign troops from Ukraine. Kyiv announced a truce in July 2020, but the Moscow-backed separatists have violated it virtually every day before the invasion.

Read the full debunk at Myth Detector.

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    %s

      Your opinion matters!

      Data Protection Information *

        Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

        Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

        Data Protection Information *

        The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.

        🎵 Playlist