“Putin has a microchip implanted in his shoulder”

  • Read this article in:
  • en
  • ru
Click here to request the narration for this article

“George W. Bush said that Putin has a microchip implanted in his shoulder”. This was the headline in a story published last week by the Russian daily Moskovskiy Komsomolets (MK). Had a former American President suddenly engaged in spreading disinformation about the current Head of the Russian State?

Lost in translation

The article in MK summarised statements George W. Bush made on Thursday about the issue of Russian interference in the American Presidential elections. What Bush had said in English was that Vladimir Putin has “a chip on his shoulder … because the demise of the Soviet Union troubles him. Therefore, much of his moves [are] to regain Soviet hegemony,” as The Guardian reported.

In other words, MK had made a literal Russian translation of the English idiomatic expression “to have a chip on your shoulder”, meaning “to seem angry all the time because you think you have been treated unfairly or feel you are not as good as other people”, as the Cambridge online dictionary explains. The mistake was picked up on Twitter by Alexey Kovalev, a Russian blogger who writes about propaganda and disinformation.

The microchip implantation conspiracy theory

No doubt, MK’s mistranslation was unintentional. However, the effect of it was that George W. Bush has helped recall a couple of the more entertaining pieces of disinformation we have described on our website: For example, the claim from RT (Russia Today) that in the West, microchips are implanted under the skin of office workers to make them more submissive and passive; and the story from Sputnik about how the EU wants to control all payments, preferably by implanting microchips under the skin of citizens.

Further reading:

Three things you should know about RT and Sputnik

Translating Russian troops out of Ukraine

Disclaimer

Cases in the EUvsDisinfo database focus on messages in the international information space that are identified as providing a partial, distorted, or false depiction of reality and spread key pro-Kremlin messages. This does not necessarily imply, however, that a given outlet is linked to the Kremlin or editorially pro-Kremlin, or that it has intentionally sought to disinform. EUvsDisinfo publications do not represent an official EU position, as the information and opinions expressed are based on media reporting and analysis of the East Stratcom Task Force.

    %s

      Your opinion matters!

      Data Protection Information *

        Subscribe to the Disinfo Review

        Your weekly update on pro-Kremlin disinformation

        Data Protection Information *

        The Disinformation Review is sent through Mailchimp.com. See Mailchimp’s privacy policy and find out more on how EEAS protects your personal data.

        🎵 Playlist